Webinar – The African Court Climate Advisory Opinion and the Case for Climate Reparations

Date

Tuesday May 12, 2026

Join us on Tuesday, 12 May 2026, from 14:00 to 15:30 EAT, for a webinar on The African Court Climate Advisory Opinion and the Case for Climate Reparations.

This moderated expert dialogue will unpack the advisory opinion request before the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights and what it could mean for state obligations, corporate accountability, and the right to reparations for climate harm. French interpretation will be available.

At a time when climate justice, reparatory justice, and African legal agency are converging, this conversation will ask what it means to pursue climate reparations from an African human rights perspective. Together, speakers will examine how the proceedings can strengthen demands for accountability from major emitting states and corporate actors, address the colonial roots of climate vulnerability, and shape African strategies ahead of COP32 in Ethiopia next year.

Register here: https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_m4HHW9sOTEWDudTYdmiUVg (external link) 

Background

In May 2025, a coalition of African civil society organizations, including the African Climate Platform, Natural Justice, Resilient 40, the Environmental Lawyer Collective for Africa, and the Pan African Lawyers Union, has requested an advisory opinion from the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights (AfCHPR) on States’ obligations in relation to the climate crisis. The proceedings place core questions of prevention, human rights protection, and legal responsibility squarely before the Court. If successful, this would be the first ruling rooted in African regional norms to explicitly address state obligations, corporate accountability, and the right to reparations for climate harm. Such a decision would assert African agency in shaping global climate law and equip African states and movements with an instrument to demand justice on the world stage. 

This process builds on a rapidly evolving body of international jurisprudence. Over the past year, advisory opinions from the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, the Inter American Court of Human Rights, and the International Court of Justice have clarified that:

  • States have due diligence obligations to prevent climate harm
  • These obligations extend to regulating private actors, including fossil fuel companies
  • Breaches may trigger obligations of cessation and full reparation

Taken together, these opinions establish a baseline of legal principles on prevention, cooperation, and reparation. The African Court now faces a distinct task: translating and advancing these principles within the African human rights system, grounded in the continent’s legal frameworks, socio economic realities, and historical context.Reparations sit at the center of this process. Across amicus submissions and broader advocacy, there is convergence around a core proposition: obligations of African States cannot be reduced to domestic mitigation and adaptation alone. They must also include:

The proceedings also unfold against growing political traction around reparations for historical injustices and their ongoing legacies, including the UN General Assembly resolution recognizing slavery as the gravest crime against humanity and the African Union’s Decade on Reparations. These legal and political trajectories are beginning to align, but remain underdeveloped in practice. Additionally, the COP32 climate summit will be hosted in Africa under the Presidency of Ethiopia. 

This webinar intervenes at that junction: immediately after the submission of amicus briefs and before the Court begins its deliberations. It provides a space to interrogate how reparations are being framed, contested, and advanced within the proceedings, and what is at stake for African legal and political strategies moving forward.

Objectives

  • Examine how climate reparations are being articulated in amicus submissions to the African Court.
  • Clarify the legal implications of recent advisory opinions for African States’ obligations in relation to climate harm.
  • Assess the role of African States in securing remedies domestically and pursuing accountability internationally.
  • Contribute to a more grounded and legally informed understanding of climate reparations among judges, legal practitioners, civil society, and the broader public.
  • Interrogate the relationship between reparations, structural injustice, and ongoing forms of climate coloniality.
  • Explore how current policy approaches, including carbon markets and offsets, align or conflict with obligations to prevent harm and ensure justice.
  • Identify strategic entry points for legal mobilization, advocacy, and coalition building following the advisory opinion process.